AZ State Law Assignment 2 of 2

Please review the following case study and answer the following multiple choice questions in the comments section below.

Bev, one of the owners of S & L Associates, tasks Dave with coming up with some ads to promote new loan products.
Dave recruits his co-worker Fred to brainstorm some concepts for ads. Since they are starting this project in late September, their main ad revolves around Halloween. It has a banner across the top that says, “Don’t be afraid of our sweet deals!” Okay, so it’s not the greatest advertisement ever created, but Dave and Fred are proud of it.
With the big creative hurdle out of the way, Dave delegates the job of filling in the standard information to Fred. The rest of the flyer is pretty standard stuff:
·       Interest rate quote;
·       Repayment term of the loan in years;
·       APR;
·       Company name;
·       Company address; and
·       A statement that says, “Official Arizona Mortgage Licensee”.
Fred even adds “Established in Arizona in 1987” right under the S & L Associates logo as a final touch – just to give potential clients confidence that the company has longevity in the community.
Meanwhile, spurred on by his burst of ad-making creativity, Dave decides to design some new business cards for himself. He uses the S & L logo as a faded watermark across the front of the card, and includes:
·       His name;
·       His unique identifier;
·       The office address;
·       The office phone number; and
·       The company’s website address front and center.
Fred brings his finished ad flyer to Dave for approval. Dave looks it over and decides it looks great. He tells Fred to take it down to make some color copies there in the office for immediate use. Dave knows a few real estate agents with open houses coming up that could use the ad right away. Once Fred does this, Dave sends the master copies of the ad flyer and his new business card to the print shop they always use.
A week or so later, the print shop courier stops by with boxes of flyers and Dave’s business cards. Everyone in the office is so impressed with Dave’s business cards that they decide to make it a company-wide design.
Also, the few color copies of the ad flyer that Fred made a pretty significant impact among Dave’s real estate buddies. Two of them sold properties because the ad flyers helped give buyers a fuller picture of the deal from start to finish, and three more had buyers who were really interested.
Word gets around, so the demand for more of these Halloween-themed flyers has gone through the roof – so much so that every last flyer that they got back from the print shop had to be shipped right back out to Dave’s real estate contacts.
All in all, it was good creative project that broke up some of the monotony of Dave and Fred’s workday. The only problem is that the print shop did not send back the CD with the master files on them, and Fred accidentally deleted the flyer file.
So, while Dave’s business card master file is safe on his computer, they no longer have a copy of the ad flyer in the office. But it’s not such a big deal. After all, the ad was only good for the month of October and they are already well into the month. If they need to make more, they can call the print shop and, hopefully, the shop will be able to locate the CD and make more flyers.  
Now, let’s take a closer look at this whole process and see what we can learn from it.

Case Study Questions

1.     Look back over the information that Fred included in the flyer. Did he forget anything?

A.    Yes. He forgot to include his and Dave’s unique identifiers. 
B.    No. For once, Fred actually did a thorough job in filling in the advertisement information.
C.    Yes. Fred forgot to include S & L’s license number.
D.    Both A and B

2.     Did Fred include any language that goes directly against Arizona state law?
A.    Yes. Instead of including the phrase “Official Arizona Mortgage Licensee”, Fred should have stated that S & L was a “Arizona Licensed Mortgage Company”.
B.    Yes. The phrase “Established in Arizona in 1987” is a misleading statement that is specifically prohibited by Arizona state law. Potential borrowers might construe this phrase as an endorsement by the state.
C.    Yes. Instead of including the phrase “Official Arizona Mortgage Licensee”, Fred should have included the statement that S & L is “Licensed by the Arizona Department of Banking and Consumer Finance”.
D.    No. Fred’s use of language in the ad flyer was entirely legal. 

3.     What about Dave’s business card? Did it comply with Arizona state law?
A.    Yes. He put all of the pertinent contact information on it that a potential client would need.
B.    No. Dave should have included S & L’s license number on the card.
C.    No. Dave should have the words “Arizona Licensed Mortgage Company” with the company name.
D.    Both B and C.  

4.     What do you think about the print shop not sending back the CD with the master file for the flyer?
A.    It is not really a problem. They can always call the print shop and have them find the CD to make more flyers.
B.    It definitely poses a problem because S & L needs to keep a copy of the flyer on file for at least two (2) years.
C.    It will not really be a problem, since the law only requires the licensee to keep such a flyer on file as long as the promotion is running. Because this promotion is only for October, and they are well into October, not having a copy on file in the office is not entirely legal, but okay.

5.     As far as the flyer goes, Dave and Fred forgot one more thing that is required under Arizona state law. What was it? 
A.    They forgot to get Bev’s approval on it.
B.    They forgot to get their co-workers’ approval on the flyer.
C.    They forgot to include their co-workers’ unique identifiers on it.
D.    Actually, they remembered everything.


After you finish with the assignment you may return to finish the rest of the course content.

No comments:

Post a Comment